Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Heritability of Physiological and Phenological Characteristics of some Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) Genotypes under Climatic Conditions of Kurdistan, Iran

Arab Tajandarreh, Esmail; Ismaili, Ahmad; Rezaei Nejad, Abdolhossein; Karami, Farhad

doi:10.29252/pgr.3.2.43

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 3, Issue 2 (2017)

pgr 2017, 3(2): 43-58

Back to browse issues page

Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Heritability of Physiological and Phenological Characteristics of some Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) Genotypes under Climatic Conditions of Kurdistan, Iran

Esmail Arab Tajandarreh

, Ahmad Ismaili ^*

, Abdolhossein Rezaei Nejad

, Farhad Karami

Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

Abstract: (19327 Views)

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) is one of the important and commercial small fruits that are planted in temperate regions which contain high amount of natural antioxidants. Study of genetic diversity is very important for distinguish the genotypes relationships and evaluation and exploitation of genetic resources for breeding programs. To evaluate the physiological and phenological characteristics of strawberries genotypes, an experiment was carried out using a randomized complete block design with 3 replications in the Agricultural Research Center of Kurdistan, Iran. Physiological parameters (amount of chlorophyll a, b and ab, soluble solids, titratable acidity and anthocyanin) and phenological characters (appearance of first stolon, first flower and first fruit, flowering and fruiting period) and yield of genotypes were evaluated. Results of analysis of variance showed significant differences among genotypes for all traits at the 1% level of probability, indicating the existence of genetic diversity among genotypes. The results of mean comparison showed significant differences among genotypes for all traits, indicating existence of wide diversity among the studied strawberry genotypes. The highest chlorophyll content belonged to Paros genotype and the highest yield recorded from Queen Eliza and Gaviota genotypes, respectively. The highest anthocyanin and soluble solids content was belonged to Gaviota and lowest amount of these parameters belonged to Paros and Chandler genotypes and Chandler genotype also had the highest amount of chlorophyll a. There were little difference between phenotypic and genotypic coefficient of variation, indicating the low effect of environment on these characters. All traits had high common heritability with range of 82-99 %. Data were analyzed using principal factor analysis. The factor analysis technique extracted four factors. Four factors explained about 74.05% of the total variation, and 50.84% of the variance was accounted for by the two first factors. Factors I and II were identified as photosynthetic, and fertility Index, respectively. According to results of factor analysis and other analysis, Paros genotype was identified as suitable cultivar.

Keywords: Strawberry, Genotypic coefficient of variation, Chlorophyll, Factor analysis

Full-Text [PDF 704 kb] (3011 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Plant improvement

References

1. Abdemeyshani, S. and Shahnejat-Boushehri, A.A. (1998). Advanced Plant Breeding, Vol 1,2Tehran University Press, Tehran, Iran (In Persian).

2. Arab Tajandarreh; E., Rezaei Nejad, A., Ismaili, A. and Karami, F. (2015). Study of genetic diversity and factor analysis for yield and some morphological traits in strawberry cultivars. Applied Crop Breeding, 3(1): 13-26 (In Persian).

3. Ashraf, M.Y., Azmi, A.R. Khan A.H. and Ala, S.A. (1994). Effect of water stress on total phenolsperoxidase activity and chlorophyll content in wheat. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 16(3): 185-191.

4. Behnamian, M. and Masiha, S. (2002). Strawberry. Sotudeh Press, Tabriz, Iran (In Persian). Carr, A.C. and Frei, B. (1999). Toward a new recommended dietary allowance or vitamin Cbased on antioxidant and health effects in humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69: 10861107.

5. Cordenunsi, B.R., Oliveira do Nascimento, J.R., Genovese, M.I. and Lajolo, F.M. (2002). Influence of cultivar on quality parameters and chemical composition of strawberry fruits grown in Brazil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50: 2581-2586.

6. Ebrahimi, S., Rezaei Nejad, A., Ismaili, A. and Karami, F. (2015). Physiological and phenological variability and heritability of some apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars and genotypes. Plant Genetic Researches, 1(2): 55-70.

7. Ehdaei, B. (1994). Plant Breeding. Mashhad University Press, Mashhad, Iran (In Persian).

8. FAO. (2014). FAO stat agricultural statistics database. Available at: from http://www.fao.org

9. Giusti, M.M. and Wrolstad, R.E. (2001). Characterization and measurement of anthocyanin by UVvisible spectroscopy. Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry, F1.2.1-F1.2.13.

10. Hancock, J.F. (1999). Strawberries. CAB international, Walinford, UK.

11. Hancock, J.F, Scott, D.H. and Lawarance, F.J. (1996). Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding. Springer, NL.

12. Heinonen, M.I, Meyer, A.S. and Frankle, E.N. (1998). Antioxidant activity of berry phenolics on human low-density lipoprotein and liposome oxidation. Agriculture Food chemistry, 46: 4107-4112.

13. Ielpo, M.T., Basile, A., Miranda, R., Moscatiello, V., Nappo, C., Sorbo, C., Laghi, E., Ricciardi, L. Ricciardi, M.M. and Vuotto, M.L. (2000). Immuno pharmacological properties of flavonoids. Fitoterapia, 71: 101-109.

14. Itani, Y., Hara, T., Phum, W.N., Fujime, Y. and Yoshida. Y. (1999). Effect of co2 environment and planting density on the yield, fruit quality and absoption of water and mineral nutrients in strawberry grown in peat bag culture. Environmental Control in Biology, 37(3):171-177.

15. Jiajun, L., Yuhua, L., Guodong, D., Hanping, D. and Mingqin, D. (2005). A natural pentaploid strawberry genotype from the Changbai mountains in Northeast China. Horticultural Science, 40: 1194-1195.

16. Jiang, Y. and Huang. N. (2001). Drought and heat stress injury to two cool-season turfgrasses in relation to antioxidant metabolism and lipid peroxidation. Crop Sciences, 41: 436-442.

17. Kafkas, E., Kosar, M., Paydas, S., Kafkas, S. and Baser, K.H.C. (2007). Quality characteristics of strawberry genotypes at different maturation stages. Food chemistry, 100: 1229-1236.

18. Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analysis rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika23:187-200.

19. Kashi, A.K. and Hekmati, J. (1991). Strawberry Breeding. Ahmadi Press, Tehran, Iran (In Persian). Khoshkam, S. (2010). Evaluation of yield, quality and quantity characteristics of strawberry cultivar under greenhouse conditions in Jiroft and Kahnoj region. 5th National Conference on New Ideas in Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Isfahan, Khorasgan, Iran (In Persian).

20. Klamkowsky, K. and Ttreder, W. (2006). Morphological and physiological response of strawberry plants to water stress, Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 71: 159-165.

21. Lansari, A., Iezzoni, F. and Kester, D.E. (1994). Morphological variation within collections of Moroccan almond clones and Mediterranean and North American cultivars. Euphytica, 78: 27-41.

22. Li, Y.H., Han, Z.H. and XU, X. (2004). Segregation of AFLP markers in F1 hybrids of a cross between tetraploid and diploid species in the genus Malus. Plant Breed, 123: 316-320.

23. Antunes, L.E.C., Ristow, N.C., Krolow, A.C.R., Carpenedo, S. and Reisser Junior, C. (2010). Yield and quality of strawberry cultivars. Horticultural Brasileira, 28: 222-226.

24. Mohammadi, J.F., Moosavi, A. (2013). Evaluation of yield quality and quantity characterstics of fragaria vesca L. cultivars under greenhouse conditions in jiroft and kahnooj rejoin. International Journal of Agriculture, 3(4): 923-927.

25. Pelayo-Zeldivar, C., Ebeler, S. and Kader, A. (2005). Cultivar and harvest date effects on flavour and the quality attributes of California strawberries. Journal of Food Quality. 28: 78-97.

26. Rahmati, F., Javadi, T., Ghaderi, N. and Mozafari, A.A. (2012). Evaluation of antioxidant capacity of fruits in 2 strawberry genotypes at different stages of growth. 1th National Conference of Strawberry, University of Kurdestan, Iran (In Persian).

27. Rutkowski, K.P., Kruczynska, D.E. and Zurawicz. E. (2006). Quality and shelf life of strawberry cultivars in Poland. Acta Horticulturae. 708: 329-332.

28. Sakti, J. and Khadag, B. (1995). Evidence of geomorphological divergence in kabuli chickpea from germplasm evaluation data. Crop Science, 33: 626-636.

29. Singh, A., Patel, R.K., De, L.C. and Pereira, L.S. (2008). Performance of strawberry (fragaria ananasa) cultivars under sub-tropics of Megalaya. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 78(7): 575-580.

30. Stansfield, W.D. (1991). Theory and Problems in Genetics. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.

31. Staudt, G. (1999). Systematics and Geographical Distribution of the American Strawberry Species: Taxonomic Studies in the Genus Fragaria (Rosaceae: Potentilleae). University of California Publications in Botany, Berkeley, CA. USA.

32. Tadesse, W. and Bekele, E. (2001). Factor analysis of components of yield in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsletter, 2: 91-93.

33. Wang, S.Y. and Jiao, H. (2000). Scavenging capacity of berry crops on superoxide radicalshydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals, and singlet oxygen. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48: 5677-5684.

34. Zhao, Y. (2007). Berry fruit, value- added products for health production. CRC press. New York, USA.

‎ 10.29252/pgr.3.2.43

‎ 20.1001.1.23831367.1395.3.2.4.5

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Arab Tajandarreh E, Ismaili A, Rezaei Nejad A, Karami F. Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Heritability of Physiological and Phenological Characteristics of some Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) Genotypes under Climatic Conditions of Kurdistan, Iran. pgr 2017; 3 (2) :43-58
URL: http://pgr.lu.ac.ir/article-1-98-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 3, Issue 2 (2017)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657