[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: About :: Main :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..



 
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 2 (2020) ::
pgr 2020, 6(2): 1-20 Back to browse issues page
Genetic Analysis of Response to Water Deficit Stress Based on Physiological Traits in Wheat
Ali Akbar Asadi * , Mostafa Valizadeh , Seyed Abolghasem Mohammadi , Manochehr Khodarahmi
Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), zanjan , a.asady@areeo.ac.ir
Abstract:   (12324 Views)
Dehydration is the most important limiting factor in agricultural production in arid and semi-arid regions, and water shortages (especially at the reproductive stages) due to lack of precipitation and unequal distribution are inappropriate for limiting the yield. In this research, cross between the Gasspard cultivar (dehydrated susceptible parent) and DN11 line (resistant parent) was performed. F1, F2, F3, BC1 and BC2 generations along with parents, were planted in a randomized complete blocks design with three replications in normal and water deficit conditions for two consecutive years. Physiological traits were measured for single plant samples. Weighted analysis of variance showed that water deficit stress caused significant decrease in flag leaf area and unsignificant decrease in stomatal conductance. Generation mean analysis for Chlorophyll index was accompanied by different results in terms of regression fitted models for each environment, but for stomatal conductance, the results of the generation mean analysis were the same in both environments. In addition to additive and dominant effects, epistatic interaction effects also played role in the inheritance of all studied traits. Most of these effects were double-effects. In flag leaf area, additive, additive × dominant and dominant × dominant effects were involved in inheritance. In water relative content, in addition to these effects, dominant effect was also involved in inheritance. Generations variance analysis showed that the gene action was additive for relative water content, dominant for flag leaf area and over dominant (in both conditions) for stomatal conductance. The gene action for Chlorophyll index under stress and normal conditions were over dominant and additive respectively.
Keywords: Water deficit condition, Physiologic traits, Wheat
Full-Text [PDF 1258 kb]   (1373 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Plant genetics
Accepted: 2019/10/6
References
1. Ahmadi, A. and Baker, D.A. (2001). The effect of water stress on grain filling processes in wheat. Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 136: 257-269. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859601008772]
2. Al-Hakimi, A., Monneveaux, P. and Nachit, M.M. (1998). Direct and indirect selection for drought tolerance in alien tetraploid wheat × durum wheat crosses. Euphytica, 100: 287-294. [DOI:10.1023/A:1018328911946]
3. Almeselmani, M., Abdullah, F., Hareri, F., Naaesan, M., Ammar, M.A. and Zuherkanbar, O. (2011). Effect of drought on different physiological characters and yield component in different varieties of Syrian durum wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3: 127-133. [DOI:10.5539/jas.v3n3p127]
4. Alonso, R., Elvira, S., Castillo, F.J. and Gimeno, B.S. (2001). Interactive effects of ozone and drought stress on pigments and activities of antioxidative enzymes in Pinus halepensis. Plant Cell and Environment, 24: 905-916. [DOI:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00738.x]
5. Ashraf, M.Y., Azmi, A.R., Khan, A.H. and Ala, S.A. (1994). Effect of water stress on total phenols, peroxidase activity and Chlorophyll content in wheat. Acta physiologiae plantarum. 16(3): 185-191.
6. Baker, N.R. and Horton, P.H. (1987). Chlorophyll Fluorescence Quenching During Photoinhibition. In: Kyle, D.J., Osmond, C.B. and Arntzen, C.J., Eds., Photoinhibition, pp. 85-94. Elsevier Science Publisher, Amsterdam, NL.
7. Bidinger, F.R., Mahalakshmi, V. and Rao, G.D.P. (1978). Assessment of drought resistance in millet factors effecting yields under stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 38: 37-48. [DOI:10.1071/AR9870037]
8. Bishop, D.L. and Bugbee, B.G. (1998). Photosynthetic capacity and dry mass partitioning in dwarf and semi-dwarf wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology, 153: 558-565. [DOI:10.1016/S0176-1617(98)80204-6]
9. Blum, A. and Jordan W.R. (1985). Breeding crop varieties for stress environments. Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 2(3): 199-238. [DOI:10.1080/07352688509382196]
10. Blum, A., Shpiler, L., Golan, G. and Mayer, J. (1989). Yield stability and canopy temperature of wheat genotypes under drought stress. Field Crops Research, 22: 289-296. [DOI:10.1016/0378-4290(89)90028-2]
11. Bruck, H., Payne, W.A. and Sattelmacher, B. (2000). Effects of phosphorus and water supply on yield, transpiration, water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination of pearl millet. Crop Science, 40: 120-125. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2000.401120x]
12. Castrillo, M. and Calcagno, A.M. (1989). Effects of water stress and re-watering on rebulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity, chlorophyll and protein contents in two cultivars of tomato. Journal of Horticultural Science, 64(6): 717-724. [DOI:10.1080/14620316.1989.11516014]
13. Chandrasekar, V., Sairam, R.K. and Srivastava, G.C. (2000). Physiological and biochemical responses of hexaploid and tertaploid wheat to drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 185: 219-227. [DOI:10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00430.x]
14. Chowdhry, M.A., Rasool, I., Khaliq, I., Mahmood, T. and Gilani, M.M. (1999). Genetics of some metric traits in spring wheat under normal and drought environment. Rachis Newsletter, 18: 34-39.
15. Colom, M.R. and Vazzana, C. (2003). Photosynthesis and PSII functionality of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive weeping lovegrass plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 49: 135-144. [DOI:10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00065-5]
16. Cornic, G. (2000). Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science, 5(5): 187-188. [DOI:10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01625-3]
17. Dana, I. and Dasgupta, T. (2001). Combining ability in black gram. Indian Journal of Genetics, 61: 170-171.
18. Darroch, B.A. and Baker R.J. (1990). Grain filling in three spring wheat genotypes: statistical analysis. Crop Science, 30: 525-529. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030009x]
19. Darvishzadeh, R., Alipour, H. and Sarrafi, A. (2017). Generation mean analysis to black stem disease resistance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), using mixed linear models. Plant Genetic Researches, 4(2): 29-42 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/pgr.4.2.29]
20. Silva, M.A., Jifon, J.L., Jagd, S. and Sharma, V. (2007). Use of physiological parametersas fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Brazilian Journal Plant Physiology, 19: 193-201. [DOI:10.1590/S1677-04202007000300003]
21. Draikewicz, M. (1994). Chlorophyllase occurrence functions, mechanism of action, effect of extra and internal factors. Photosynthesis, 30: 321-337.
22. Esmaeilzadeh Moghaddam, M., Arzani, A., Rezai, A. and Mirlohi, A.F. (2011).Genetic analysis of some related characters to drought tolerance in bread wheat cultivars. Journal of Crop Production, 5(1): 105-122.
23. Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F.C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Pearson Longman, Harlow, UK.
24. Farshadfar, E. and Amiri, R. (2015). Genetic analysis of physiological indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat using diallel techniques. Genetika, 47(1): 107-118. [DOI:10.2298/GENSR1501107F]
25. Fischer, R.A. and Kohn, G.D. (1966). The relationship of grain yield to vegetative growth and post flowering leaf area in the wheat crop under conditions of limited soil moisture. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 17: 281-295. [DOI:10.1071/AR9660281]
26. Flood, P.J., Harbinson, J. and Aarts, M.G. (2011). Natural genetic variation in plant photosynthesis. Trends in Plant Science, 16: 327-335. [DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.02.005]
27. Ford, M.A., Blackwell, R.D., Parker, M.L. and Austin, R.B. (1979). Associations between stem solidity, soluble carbohydrate accumulation and other characters in wheat. Annals of Botany, 44: 731-738. [DOI:10.1093/annbot/44.6.731]
28. Foulkes, M.J., Slafer, G.A., Davies, W.J., Berry, P.M., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Martre, P., Calderini, D.F., Griffiths, S. and Reynolds, M.P. (2011). Raising yield potential of wheat. III. Optimizing partitioning to grain while maintaining lodging resistance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62: 469-486. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erq300]
29. Ganji Arjenaki, F., Jabbari, R. and Morshedi, A. (2012). Evaluation of drought stress on relative water content, Chlorophyll content and mineral elements of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varietes. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 4(11): 726-729.
30. Ghosh, P.K., Ajay, K.K., Bandyopadhyay, M.C., Manna, K.G., Mandal, A.K. and Hati, K.M. (2004). Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping system in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. Bioresource Technology, 95: 85-93. [DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.012]
31. Gibson, L.R. and Paulsen, G.M. (1999). Yield components wheat grown under high temperature: stress during reproductive growth. Crop Science, 39: 1841-1846. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1999.3961841x]
32. Golabadi, M., Arzani, A. and Mir Mohammadi Meibodi, S.A.M. (2007). Genetic analysis of some morphological traits in durum wheat by generation mean analysis under normal and drought stress conditions. Seed and Plant Improwement Journal, 24(1): 99-116 (In Persian).
33. Golestani Araghi, S. and Assad, M.T. (1998). Evaluation of four screening techniques for drought resistance and their relationship to yield reduction ratio in wheat. Euphytica, 103: 293-299. [DOI:10.1023/A:1018307111569]
34. Gonzalev, A., Bermejo, V. and Gimeno, B.S. (2010). Effect of different physiological traits on grain yield in barley grown under irrigated and terminal water deficit conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, 148: 319-328. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859610000031]
35. Gregersen, P.L. and Holm, P.B. (2007). Transcriptome analysis of senescence in the flag leaf of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotecnology Journal, 5(1): 192-206. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00232.x]
36. Gupta, U.S. (1995). Physiological Aspects of Dry Lands Farming. Oxford & IBH Pub. Co., New Delhi, IND.
37. Guseynova, I.M., Suleymanov, S. and Aliyev, J.A. (2006). Protein composition and native state of pigments of thylakoid membrane of Wheat genotypes differently tolerant to water stress. Biochemistry, 71: 223-228. [DOI:10.1134/S000629790602009X]
38. Hamada, E.E. and El-Beialy, E.M.A. (2003). Assessment of some breeding parameters for yield and its attributes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Egyptian Journal of Applied Science, 18(12): 1552-1563.
39. Hassani, F., Houshmand, S., Rafiei, F. and Niazi, A. (2018). Evaluation of wheat cultivars and lines for terminal drought tolerance using drought tolerance and susceptibility indices. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 10(33): 55-68.
40. Herzog, H. (1986). Source and Sink during the Reproductive Period of Wheat. Development and Its Regulation with Special Reference to Cytokinins. Paul Parey Scientific Publishers, Berlin, DE.
41. Hetherington, A.M. and Woodward. F.I. (2003). The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature, 242: 901-908. [DOI:10.1038/nature01843]
42. Huffaker, R.C., Radin, T., Kleinkopf, G.E. and Cox, E.L. (1970). Effect of mild water stress on enzyme of nitrate assimilation and of the carboxylative phase of photosynthesis in barley. Crop Science, 10: 471-474. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000050003x]
43. Islam, M.S. (1998). Genetic studies on drought tolerance in wheat. I. relative leaf water content membranes stability and stomata frequency. Annual Agriculture Research, 19(4): 458-462.
44. Jiang, Y. and Huang, B.T. (2002). Response of antioxidative defense system to temperature and water stress combinations in wheat seedlings. Plant Science, 163: 783-790. [DOI:10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00213-3]
45. Kranner, I., Beckett, R.P., Wornik, S., Zorn, M. and Pfeifhofer, H.W. (2002). Revival of a resurrection plant correlates with its antioxidant status. Plant Journal, 31: 13-24. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01329.x]
46. Kumar, A. and Sharma, S.C. (2007). Genetics of excised-leaf water loss and relative water content in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Research Communications, 35(1): 43-52. [DOI:10.1556/CRC.35.2007.1.6]
47. Kuroda, M., Qzawa, T. and Imagawa, H. (1990). Changes in chloroplast peroxidase activities in relation to Chlorophyll loss in barley leaf segments. Physiologia Plantarum, 80: 555-560. [DOI:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1990.800410.x]
48. Lafitte, R. (2002). Relationship between leaf relative water content during reproductive stage, water deficit and grain formation in rice. Field Crops Research, 76: 165-174. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00037-0]
49. Lawlor, D.W. (1995). Environment and Plant Metabolism: Flexibility and Acclimation. Bios Scientific Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK.
50. Liang, Z., Zhang, F., Shao, M. and Zhang, J. (2002). The relations of stomatal conductance, water consumption, growth rate to leaf water potential during soil drying and rewatering cycle of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica. 43: 187-192.
51. Liu, F., Andersen, M.N. and Jensen, C.R. (2003). Loss of pod set caused by drought stress in associated with water status and ABA content of reproductive structures in soybean. Functional Plant Biology, 30: 271-280. [DOI:10.1071/FP02185]
52. Lonbani, M. and Arzani, A. (2011). Morpho-physiological traits associated with terminal droughtstress tolerance in triticale and wheat. Agronomy Research, 9(1-2): 315-329.
53. Maes, W.H., Achten, W.M.J., Reubens, B., Raes, D., Samson, R. and Muys, B. (2009). Plant water relationships and growth strategies of Jatropha curcas L. seedlings under different levels of drought stress. Journal of Arid Environments, 73: 877-884. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.04.013]
54. Majumdar, S., Thomasson, D., Shimakawa, A. and Genant, H.K. (1991). Quantitation of the susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and bone marrow: Experimental Studies, 22(1): 111-127. [DOI:10.1002/mrm.1910220112]
55. Mamnoei, E. and Seyed Sharifi, R. (2010). Study the effects of water deficit on Chlorophyll fluorescence indices and the amount of proline in six barley genotypes and its relation with canopy temperature and yield. Journal of Plant Biology, 5: 51-62 (In Persian).
56. Merah, O. (2001). Potential importance of water status traits for durum wheat improvement under Mediterranean conditions. Journal of Agriculture Science, 137: 139-145. [DOI:10.1017/S0021859601001253]
57. Molnar, I., Dulai, S., Csernak, A., Prónay J. and Lang. M.M. (2005). Photosynthetic responses to drought stress in different Aegilops species. Acta Biology, 49: 141-142.
58. Moran, J.F., Becana, M., Iturbe-Ormaeche, I., Frechilla, S., Klucas, R.V. and Aparicio-Tejo, P. (1994). Drought induces oxidative stress in pea plants. Planta, 194: 346-352. [DOI:10.1007/BF00197534]
59. Muller, J. (1991). Determining leaf surface area by means of linear measurements in wheat and riticale (brief report). Archiv Fuchtungsforsch, 21: 121-123.
60. Parasad, P.V.V., Pisipati, S.R., Ristic, Z., Bukovnik, V. and Fritz, A.K. (2008). Impact of nighttime temperature on physiology and growth of spring wheat. Crop Science, 48: 2372-2380. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2007.12.0717]
61. Pessarkli, M. (1999). Hand Book of Plant and Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, USA.
62. Poodineh, M. and Naroui Rad, M.R. (2015). Genetic components for physiological parameters estimates in bread wheat (Triticum aestivumn L.). Annaual Research and Review in Biology, 7(3): 163-170. [DOI:10.9734/ARRB/2015/8215]
63. Rascio, A., Russo, M., Platani, C. and Difonzo, N. (1998). Drought intensity effects on genotypic differences in tissue affinity for strongly bound water. Plant Science, 132: 121-126. [DOI:10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00006-5]
64. Reynolds, M., Bonnett, D., Chapman, S.C., Furbank, R.T., Manes, Y., Mather, D.E. and Parry, M.A.J. (2011). raising yield potential of wheat. I. overview of a consortium approach and breeding strategies. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62: 439-452. [DOI:10.1093/jxb/erq311]
65. Richards, R.A. (1996). Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regulation, 20: 157-166. [DOI:10.1007/BF00024012]
66. Schonfeld, M.A., Johnson, R.C., Carver, B.F. and Mornhinweg, D.W. (1988). Water relations in winter wheat as drought tolerant indicator. Crop Science, 28(3): 526-531. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030021x]
67. Shangguan, Z., Shao, M. and Dyckmans, J. (1999). Interaction of osmotic adjustment and photosynthesis in winter wheat under soil drought. Plant Physiology, 15: 753-758. [DOI:10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80254-5]
68. Sharma, S.N., Sain, R.S. and Sharma, R.K. (2002). Gene system governing grain yield per spike in macaroni wheat. Wheat Information Service, 94: 14-18.
69. Shayan, S., Moghaddam Vahed, M., Norouzi, M., Mohammadi, S.A., Toorchi, M. and Molaei, B. (2017). Inheritance of agronomical and physiological traits in the progeny of Moghan and Arg bread wheat varieties cross. Plant Genetic Researches, 4(2): 43-60 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/pgr.4.2.43]
70. Siosemardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K. and Ebrahimzadeh, H. (2003). Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to photosynthesis and their relationship with drought resistance in wheat cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 34(4): 93-106 (In Persian).
71. Slafer, G.A. and Araus. J.L. (1998). Keynote address: mproving wheat responses to abiotic stresses. 9th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Saskatchewan, CA.
72. Soleimani, Z., Ramshini, H., Mortazavian, M.M., Fazael najafabadi, M. and Foughi, B. (2014). Screening for drought tolerance in iraninan wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) using physiological traits evaluated under drought stress and normal condition. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 8(2): 200-207.
73. Subbarao, G.V., Chauhan, Y.S. and Johansen, C. (2000). Patterns of osmotic adjustment in pigeonpea, its importance as a mechanism of drought resistance. European Journal of Agronomy, 12: 239-249. [DOI:10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00050-2]
74. Tarahomi, G., Lahouti, M. and Abbasi, F. (2010). Effect of drought stress on variations of soluble sugar chlorophyll and potassium in salvia Leriifolia benth. Zanjan Islamic Azad University Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(2): 1-7.
75. Turner, N.C. (1986). Adaptation to water deficits: a changing perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 13: 175-190. [DOI:10.1071/PP9860175]
76. Yadav, R., Gayadin, S. and Jaiswal, A.K. (2001). Morpho-physiological changes and variable yield of wheat genotypes under moisture stress conditions. Indian Journal and Plant Physiology, 6: 390-394.
77. Yordanov, I., Velikova, V. and Tsonev, T. (2000). Plant responses to drought and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica, 38(1): 171-186. [DOI:10.1023/A:1007201411474]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Asadi A A, Valizadeh M, Mohammadi S A, Khodarahmi M. Genetic Analysis of Response to Water Deficit Stress Based on Physiological Traits in Wheat. pgr 2020; 6 (2) :1-20
URL: http://pgr.lu.ac.ir/article-1-118-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 2 (2020) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش های ژنتیک گیاهی Plant Genetic Researches
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4642