|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 2 results for Simultaneous Selection
Peyman Sharifi, Abouzar Abbasian, Ali Mohaddesi,
Volume 7, Issue 2 (3-2021)
Abstract
Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) are two methods for analyzing multi-environment trials (MET). In this study, seven selected rice lines were evaluated along with two check varieties based on randomized complete block design in Tonekabon, Amol and Sari (Iran) in three growing seasons of 2011-14. To quantify the genotypic stability, the best linear unbiased predictions of the genotype by environment interactions (GEI) were estimated, and singular value decomposition (SVD), which is the basis of AMMI analysis, was performed on the resulting matrix. The likelihood ratio test (LRT) showed that the effect of GEI was significant on grain yield, number of tillers, thousand grains weight and panicle length. Therefore, due to the significant interaction of genotype by environment, BLUP analysis can be performed on this data. The biplot of first principal component (PC1) of the environment versus nominal yield showed that genotypes 7 ([IR 67015-22-6-2-(A37632) × (Amol3 × Ramzanalitarom)]39), 6 (IR67015-22-6-2-(A37632) × (Amol3 × Ramzanalitarom)]126) and 2 ([IR64669-153-2-3 - (A8948) × (4Surinam Deylamani)]2), due to the lowest scores of the PC1, had a small share in the GEI and had more grain yield stability. The biplot of grain yield versus WAASB, placed genotypes in four regions, so that genotypes in the fourth region, including genotypes 6, 7, 8 (Line 843, check variety), and 9 (Shirodi, check variety), were due to large value of response variable (high grain yield) and high stability (low values of WAASB) were very productive and had extensive stability. Identification of genotypes with weighted average of WAASB and response variable (WAASBY) criteria showed that genotypes 6 and 7 were high yields and stable. Based on the multi-trait stability index (MTSI), G6 was also selected as the best genotype in terms of grain yield, evaluated traits and stability of each trait. Totally, genotype 6 was stable and superior based on the results of all methods.
Hossein Mehripour Azbarmi, Jalal Saba, Bahram Alizadeh, Amir Gholizadeh, Farid Shekari,
Volume 11, Issue 1 (9-2024)
Abstract
The genotype × environment interaction is a major challenge in studying quantitative characters because it reduces grain yield stability in different environments. In this regard, to analysis the genotype × environment interactions and to determine the yield stability of winter rapeseed mutant lines, 9 lines and 6 cultivars were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications in six experimental field stations (Esfahan, Hamedan, Karaj, Kermanshah, Qazvin and Zarghan) during 2021–2023 croping seasons. The combined analysis of variance indicated that the effects of environments, genotypes and genotype × environment interaction were significant, suggesting that the genotypes responded differently in the studied environment conditions. So, there was the possibility of stability analysis. According to the stability analysis results using the Eberhart and Russel method, the Talaye cultivar with higher grain yield than overall mean and regression coefficient equal to one (bi=1) was identified as the genotype with high general stability for all regions. Based on the simultaneous selection method for yield and stability (YSi), the lines Z-900-6, T-1200-1, and Talaye cultivar with the lowest values were stable, whereas Zarafam, Okapi and Express cultivars with the highest values were unstable. Also, based on the SIIG index, the lines Z-900-6, T-1200-1, and Talaye cultivar with having high SIIG values as well as higher grain yields that total average was recognized as superior genotypes from the point of stability and grain yield. According to the results of cluster analysis, Karaj, Zarghan, Kermanshah and Isfahan locations were located in a group that indicates these locations had high predictability and repeatability power.
|
|
