Expression Analysis of Hv TIP2;3 and Hv TIP4;1 in Sensitive and Tolerant Barley Genotypes Under Salinity Stress

Salami, Robab; Mohammadi, Seyed Abolghasem; Ghafarian, Sara; Moghaddam, Mohammad

doi:10.29252/pgr.2.2.1

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 2, Issue 2 (2016)

pgr 2016, 2(2): 1-14

Back to browse issues page

Expression Analysis of Hv TIP2;3 and Hv TIP4;1 in Sensitive and Tolerant Barley Genotypes Under Salinity Stress

Robab Salami ^*

, Seyed Abolghasem Mohammadi

, Sara Ghafarian

, Mohammad Moghaddam

Former M.Sc. Student‚ Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology‚ Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract: (22162 Views)

Barley is the most salt tolerant cereal‚ and is grown in a wide range of climatic conditions. To improve the plant tolerance to salinity‚ expression analysis of genes involved in stress tolerance could be effective in identification and development of tolerant genotypes. In this study, for evaluation of salinity effect on expression of Hv TIP2;3 and Hv TIP4;1 genes (encoding channel proteins in the membrane) in roots of barley, three genotypes; Clipper (salt susceptible), Sahara3771 (salt tolerant) and advanced breeding line (a salt tolerant line derived from a cross between Kavir and Sahra cultivars) were planted under 0, 100 and 200 mM NaCl. To determine the expression differences of these genes, RNA was extracted from root samples harvested at 24 hours, 3 days and 3 weeks after applying salinity treatments and cDNA was generated. Analysis of variance revealed a significant difference among genotypes, salinity levels and sampling stages for Hv TIP2;3 and Hv TIP4;1 genes expression pattern, whereas genotype × salinity interaction for Hv TIP2;3and genotype × sampling stage interaction were significant for both of the studied genes. The expression of TIP 2;3 gene in the 100 mM NaCl was increased in salt susceptible genotype Clipper and decreased in tolerant genotypes compared with control. Mean comparison of genotype and sampling combination showed that the expression level of Hv TIP4;1 gene at 3 weeks after salinity stress was increased in Sahara and advanced breeding line and decreased in Clipper. According to the results‚ it was confirmed that these genes are affected by salinity stress‚ and effective utilization of this genes in the barley in order to increase salinity tolerance could lead to desirable results.

Keywords: Aquaporins, Expression pattern, Tonoplast intrinsic proteins, Barley, Hv TIP2, 3 and Hv TIP4, 1 genes

Full-Text [PDF 559 kb] (6266 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Plant improvement

References

1. Alexandersson, E., Fraysse, L., Sjovall-Larsen, S., Gustavsson, S., Fellert, M., Karlsson, M., Johanson, U. and Kjellbom, P. (2005). Whole gene family expression and drought stress regulation of aquaporins. Plant Molecular Biology, 59: 469-484.

2. Besse, M., Knipfer, T., Miller, A., Verdeil, L.J., Jahn, T. and Fricke, W. (2011). Developmental pattern of aquaporin expression in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves. Journal of ExperimentalBotany, 62: 4127-4142.

3. Boursiac, Y., Chen, S., Luu, T.D., Sorieul, M., Van-den Dries, N. and Maurel, C. (2005). Early effects of salinity on water transport in Arabidopsis roots. Molecular and cellular features of aquaporin expression. Plant Physiology, 139: 790-805.

4. Ekiz, H. and Yilmaz, A. (2003). Determination of the salt tolerance of some barley genotypes and the characteristics affecting tolerance. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 27: 253-260.

5. FAOSTAT.(2007). FAO STAT. www.faostat.Fao.org.

6. FAO. (2013). Biodiversity: Agricultural biodiversity in FAO. www.fao.org/giews/countrybrief/co untry.jsp code IRN.

7. Forrest, K.L. and Bhave, M. (2008). The PIP and TIPaquaporins in wheat form a large and diverse family with unique gene structures and functionally important features. Functional and Integrative Genomics, 8: 115-33.

8. Gao, R., Duan, K., Guo, G., Du, Z., Chen, Z., Li, L., He, T., Lu, R. and Huang, J. (2013). Comparative transcriptional profiling of two contrasting barley genotype under salinity stress during the seedling stage. International Journal of Genomics, PMC972852: 1-19.

9. Glenn, E.P., Brown, J.J. and Khan, M.J. (1997). Mechanisms of salt tolerance in higher plants.In: Basra, A.S. and Basra, R.K. (Eds). Mechanisms of environmental stress resistance in plants. Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 83-110.

10. Gimeno, J., Eattock, N., Deynze, A.V. and Blumwald., E. (2014). Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for Gene Expression Analysis in Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Using Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR. PLoS One, 9(3): e91474.

11. Hassine, A.B., Ghanem, M.E., Bouzid, S. and Lutts, S. (2008). An inland and a coastal population of the Mediterranean xero-halophyte species Atriplex halimus L. differ in their ability to proline and glycinebetaine in response to salinity and water stress. The Journal of Experimental Botany, 59: 1315-1326.

12. Horie, T., Kaneko, T., Sugimoto, G., Sasano, S., Panda, S.K., Shibasaka, M. and Katsuhara, M. (2011). Mechanisms of water transport mediated by PIP aquaporins and their regulation via phosphorylation events under salinity stress in barley roots. Plant Cell Physiology, 52: 663-675.

13. Hove, R.M., Ziemann, M. and Bhave, M. (2015). Identification and Expression Analysis of the Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Aquaporin Gene Family. PLoS One,10 (6): e0128025.

14. Jiang, Q., Roche, D., Monaco, T. and Durham, S. (2006). Gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and carbon isotope discrimination of 14 barley genetic lines in response to salinity. Field Crops Research, 96: 269-278.

15. Knight. H. and Knight, M.R. (2001). Abiotic stress signaling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. Trends in Plant Science, 6: 262-267.

16. Knipfer, T., Besse, M., Verdeil, J.L. and Fricke, W. (2011). Aquaporin-facilitated water uptake in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) roots. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62: 4115-4126.

17. Lefévre, I., Gratia, E. and Lutts, S. (2001). Discrimination between the ionic and osmotic of salt stress in relation to free polyamine level in rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Science, 161: 943-952.

18. Li, G., Santoni, V. and Maurel, C. (2014). Plant aquaporins: roles in plant physiology. Biochimica et. Biophysica Acta, 1840: 1574-1582.

19. Li, G.W., Peng, Y.H., Yu, X., Zhang, M.H., Cai, W.M., Sun, W.N. and Su, W.A. (2008). Transport functions and expression analysis of vacuolar membrane aquaporin’s in response to various stresses in rice. Journal of Plant Physiology, 165: 1879-1888.

20. Llanos, A., François, J.M. and Parrou, J.L. (2015). Tracking the best reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalization in filamentous fungi. BMC Genomics, 16: 71-89.

21. Ligaba, A., Katsuhara, M., Shibasaka, M. and Gemechis, D. (2011). Abiotic stresses modulate expression of major intrinsic proteins in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Comptes Rendus Biologies, 334: 127-139.

22. Livak, K.J. and Schmittgen, T.D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔct method. Methods, 25: 402-408.

23. Majnoon Hosseini, N. (2004). Cereals Agronomy. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, IR (In Persian).

24. Mosaddek, I., Dai, H., Zheng, W., Gao, F., Zhang, G. and Sun, D. (2013). Genotypic differences in physiological characteristics in the tolerance to drought and salinity combined stress between Tibetan wild and cultivated barley. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 63: 49-60.

25. Pfaffle, M.W. (2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research, 29: 1-45.

26. Poustini, K. (2000). Physiological responses of two varieties of wheat to salt stress. Journal ofAgricultural Sciences Iran, 2: 124-129.

27. QIAGEN. (2005). Quantitative™ SYBR® Green PCR Handbook. Health Research Institute Inc., New York, USA.

28. Sadder, M.T., Anwar, F. and Al-Doss, A.A. (2013). Gene expression and physiological analysis of Atriplex halimus (L.) under salt stress. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7:112-118.

29. Sakurai, J., Ishikawa, F., Yamaguchi, T., Uemura, M. and Maeshima, M. (2005). Identification of 33 rice aquaporin genes and analysis of their expression and function. Plant Cell Physiology, 46: 1568-1577.

30. Shannon, M.C. (1985). Principles and strategies in breeding for higher salt tolerance. Plant and Soil, 89: 227-241.

31. Tyerman, S.D., Niemietz, C.M. and Bramley, H. (2002). Plant aquaporins: multifunctional water and solute channels with expanding roles. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25: 171-173.

32. Ueda, A., Kanechi, M., Uno, Y. and Inagaki, N. (2003). Photosynthetic limitations of a halophyte sea aster (Aster tripolium L.) under water stress and NaCl stress. Journal of Plant Research, 116: 65-70.

33. Ueda, A., Kathiresan, A., Inada, M., Narita, Y., Nakamura, T., Shi, W., Takabe, T. and Bennett, J. (2004). Osmotic stress in barley regulates expression of a different set of genes than salt stress does. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55: 2213-2218.

34. Vij, S. and Tyagi, A.K. (2007). Emerging trends in the functional genomics of the abiotic stress response in crop plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 5: 361–380.

35. Walia, H., Wilson, C., Wahid, A., Condamine, P., Cui, X. and Close, T.J. (2006). Expression analysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) during salinity stress. Functional and Integrative Genomics, 2: 143-156.

36. Wan, H., Yuan, W., Ruan, M., Ye, Q., Wang, R., Li, Z., Zhou, G., Yao, Z., Zhao, J., Liu, S. and Yang, Y. (2011). Identification of reference genes for reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR normalization in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 416: 24-30.

37. Wang, X., Li, Y., Ji, W., Bai, X., Cai, H., Zhu, D., Sun, X.L., Chen, L.J. and Zhu, Y.M. (2011). A novel Glycine soja tonoplast intrinsic protein gene responds to abiotic stress and depresses salt and dehydration tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Physiology, 168: 1241-8.

38. Widodo, J., Patterson, H., Newbigin, E., Tester, M., Basic, A. and Roessner, U. (2009). Metabolic responses to salt stress of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Sahara and Clipper, which differ in salinity tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 6: 4089-4103.

39. Witzel, K., Weidner, A., Surabhi, G.K., Born, A. and Mock, H.P. (2009). Salt stress-induced alterations in the root proteome of barley genotypes with contrasting response towards salinity. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60: 3545-3557.

40. Yousif, B.S., Nguyen, N.T., Fukuda, Y., Hakata, H., Okamoto, Y., Masaoka, Y. and Saneoka, H. (2010). Effect of salinity on growth, mineral composition, photosynthesis and water relations of two vegetable crops: New Zealand spinach (Tetragonia tetragonioides) and water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 12: 211-216.

41. Zaghdoud, C., Mota-Cadenas, C., Carvajal, M., Muries, B., Ferchichi, A. and Martinez-Ballesta. M.C. (2013). Elevated CO2 alleviates negative effects of salinity on broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. Italica) plants by modulating water balance through aquaporin’s abundance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 95: 15-24.

42. Zhao, F.G. andPie, Q. (2005). Protective effects of exogenous fatty acids on root tonoplast function against salt stress in barley seedlings. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 53: 215-223.

43. Zhu, C., Schraut, D., Hartung, W. and Schaffner, A.R. (2005). Differential responses of maize MIP genes to salt stress and ABA. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56: 2971-2981.

‎ 10.29252/pgr.2.2.1

‎ 20.1001.1.23831367.1394.2.2.1.5

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Salami R, Mohammadi S A, Ghafarian S, Moghaddam M. Expression Analysis of Hv TIP2;3 and Hv TIP4;1 in Sensitive and Tolerant Barley Genotypes Under Salinity Stress. pgr 2016; 2 (2) :1-14
URL: http://pgr.lu.ac.ir/article-1-44-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 2, Issue 2 (2016)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657