Volume 6, Issue 1 (In Press 2024)
JAD 2024, 6(1): 23-50 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abin J, Samson P D. Urban habitat diversity and bird species associations in Kochi City, Kerala, India. JAD 2024; 6 (1) :23-50
URL: http://jad.lu.ac.ir/article-1-429-en.html
URL: http://jad.lu.ac.ir/article-1-429-en.html
1- Department of Zoology, Sacred Heart College (Autonomous), Thevara, Kochi, 682013, Kerala, India , abinjoseliph@gmail.com
2- Department of Zoology, Sacred Heart College (Autonomous), Thevara, Kochi, 682013, Kerala, India
2- Department of Zoology, Sacred Heart College (Autonomous), Thevara, Kochi, 682013, Kerala, India
Abstract: (1661 Views)
Identification and characterisation of urban habitats and ascertaining their species associations are essential for the conservation and management of biodiversity in urban landscapes. The study attempts to identify, describe and categorise potential urban habitats in Kochi city, Kerala, India, and to explore the association of bird faunal assemblages within each of the habitats. The study was conducted from June 2018 to May 2020. The Urban Habitat Categories were identified, described and categorised as per the Urban Habitats Biodiversity Assessment (UrHBA) procedure and a sample biotope map was prepared. The habitat association of bird species was determined from each of the identified Urban Habitat Category by evaluating the species composition of each habitat. Species sharing between the identified habitats was also examined. Critical habitats of conservation concern were identified, and their specific features were ascertained. A total of 38 Urban Habitat Categories were characterised from the landscape of Kochi City with 162 species of birds to be found associated within the urban habitats. The wide variety of urban habitats provide excellent dwellings for a large number of birds including several threatened and migratory species. Out of the five major urban habitat categories, most of the species utilise Sparsely vegetated - Life form categories. Among the 38 urban habitats, Forest phanerophytes supports greater numbers of bird species. Vegetation structure is an important factor that determines bird diversity of the urban habitats. Together with the well-vegetated habitats, sparsely vegetated, non-vegetated and artificial built habitats also significantly contribute to biodiversity of urban centres. The diverse urban habitats and the associated bird species identified from Kochi city emphasise that modified urban landscapes are equally potent as natural landscapes in upholding diverse life forms. The study highlights the necessity of maintaining habitat complexity in urban landscapes for sustainable conservation of urban biodiversity. The baseline data on urban habitats and their species association will serve as a planning tool for safeguarding the critical habitats.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Ecological Diversity
Received: 2024/01/8 | Accepted: 2024/02/28 | Published: 2024/03/31
Received: 2024/01/8 | Accepted: 2024/02/28 | Published: 2024/03/31
References
1. Alvey, A. A. (2006). Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 5 (4): 195-201. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2006.09.003]
2. Beninde, J., Veith, M. and Hochkirch, A. (2015). Biodiversity in cities needs space: A meta‐analysis of factors determining intra‐urban biodiversity variation. Ecology Letters, 18 (6): 581-592. [DOI:10.1111/ele.12427]
3. Billerman, S. M., Keeney, B. K., Rodewald, P. G. and Schulenberg, T. S. (Eds.) (2022). Birds of the World. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/home
4. Bonthoux, S., Voisin, L., Bouché-Pillon, S. and Chollet, S. (2019). More than weeds: Spontaneous vegetation in streets as a neglected element of urban biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 185: 163-172. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.009]
5. Bunce, R. G. H., Groom, G. B., Jongman, R. H. G. and Padoa-Schippa, E. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook for surveillance and monitoring of European habitats. First Edition. Wageningen, Netherlands: Alterra-rapport 1219. pp. 1-107. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/reports/344996
6. Bunce, R. G. H., Metzger, M. J., Jongman, R. H. G., Brandt, J., De Blust, G., Elena-Rossello, R., Groom, G. B., Halada, L., Hofer, G., Howard, D. C., Kovář, P., Mücher, C. A., Padoa-Schioppa, E., Paelinx, D., Palo, A., Perez-Soba, M., Ramos, I. L., Roche, P., Skånes, H. and Wrbka, T. (2008). A standardized procedure for surveillance and monitoring European habitats and provision of spatial data. Landscape Ecology, 23 (1): 11-25. [DOI:10.1007/s10980-007-9173-8]
7. Bunce, R. G. H., Pérez-Soba, M., Gómez-Sanz, V., García Del Barrio, J. M. and Elena-Rosselló, R. (2006). European framework for surveillance and monitoring of habitats: A methodological approach for Spain. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 15 (3): 249-261. [DOI:10.5424/srf/2006153-00968]
8. Burhans, D. E. and Thompson, F. R. (2006). Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands. Ecological Applications, 16 (1): 394-405. [DOI:10.1890/04-0927]
9. Buron, R., Hostetler, M. E. and Andreu, M. (2022). Urban forest fragments vs residential neighborhoods: Urban habitat preference of migratory birds. Landscape and Urban Planning, 227 (8): 104538. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104538]
10. Byrne, L. B. (2007). Habitat structure: A fundamental concept and framework for urban soil ecology. Urban Ecosystems, 10 (3): 255-274. [DOI:10.1007/s11252-007-0027-6]
11. Cassini, M. H. (2013). Distribution Ecology: From Individual Habitat Use to Species Biogeographical Range. New York, USA: Springer. pp. 1-217. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-6415-0]
12. Cornelis, J. and Hermy, M. (2004). Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69 (4): 385-401. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.038]
13. Donnelly, R. E. and Marzluff, J. M. (2004). Designing research to advance the management of birds in urbanizing areas, In: Shaw, W. W., Harris, L. K. and Vandruff, L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Urban Wildlife Symposium. Tucson, Arizona, USA. pp. 114-122. http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/adjunct/snr0704/
14. Dover, J. (2015). Green infrastructure: Incorporating plants and enhancing biodiversity in buildings and urban environments. Abingdon, England: Routledge. pp. 1-337. [DOI:10.4324/9780203121993]
15. Faeth, S. H., Bang, C. and Saari, S. (2011). Urban biodiversity: Patterns and mechanisms. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1223 (1): 69-81. [DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05925.x]
16. Farinha-Marques, P., Fernandes, C., Guilherme, F., Lameiras, J. M., Alves, P. and Bunce, R. G. H. (2017). Urban Habitats Biodiversity Assessment (UrHBA): A standardized procedure for recording biodiversity and its spatial distribution in urban environments. Landscape Ecology, 32 (9): 1753-1770. [DOI:10.1007/s10980-017-0554-3]
17. Farinha-Marques, P., Fernandes, C., Guilherme, F., Lameiras, J., Alves, P. and Bunce, R. (2015). Morphology and Biodiversity in the Urban Green Spaces of the City of Porto. Book II - Habitat Mapping and Characterization. Porto, Portugal: CIBIO - Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources. pp. 1-95.
18. Firth, L. B., Schofield, M., White, F. J., Skov, M. W. and Hawkins, S. J. (2014). Biodiversity in intertidal rock pools: Informing engineering criteria for artificial habitat enhancement in the built environment. Marine Environmental Research, 102: 122-130. [DOI:10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.03.016]
19. Hall, L. S., Krausman, P. R. and Morrison, M. L. (1997). The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25 (1): 173-182.
20. Havlíček, J., Riegert, J., Bandhauerová, J., Fuchs, R. and Šálek, M. (2021). Species-specific breeding habitat association of declining farmland birds within urban environments: Conservation implications. Urban Ecosystems, 24 (6): 1259-1270. [DOI:10.1007/s11252-021-01111-9]
21. Jalkanen, J., Vierikko, K. and Moilanen, A. (2020). Spatial prioritization for urban Biodiversity Quality using biotope maps and expert opinion. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 49: 126586. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126586]
22. Jokimäki, J., Suhonen, J. and Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M.-L. (2018). Urban core areas are important for species conservation: A European-level analysis of breeding bird species. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178: 73-81. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.020]
23. Khera, N., Mehta, V. and Sabata, B. C. (2009). Interrelationship of birds and habitat features in urban greenspaces in Delhi, India. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8 (3): 187-196. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.05.001]
24. Kindt, R. and Coe, R. (2005). Tree diversity analysis: A manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agrofirestry Centre. pp. 1-196.
25. Kovalenko, K. E., Thomaz, S. M. and Warfe, D. M. (2012). Habitat complexity: Approaches and future directions. Hydrobiologia, 685 (1): 1-17. [DOI:10.1007/s10750-011-0974-z]
26. Krausman, P. R. (1999). Some basic principles of habitat use, In: Launchbaugh, K. L., Sanders, K. D. and Mosley, J. L. (Eds.), Grazing behaviour of livestock and wildlife - Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station Bulletin 70. Moscow, Russia: University of Idaho. pp. 85-90.
27. Lepczyk, C. A., Aronson, M. F. J., Evans, K. L., Goddard, M. A., Lerman, S. B. and MacIvor, J. S. (2017). Biodiversity in the city: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. BioScience, 67 (9): 799-807. [DOI:10.1093/biosci/bix079]
28. Li, E., Parker, S. S., Pauly, G. B., Randall, J. M., Brown, B. V. and Cohen, B. S. (2019). An urban biodiversity assessment framework that combines an urban habitat classification scheme and citizen science data. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7: 277. [DOI:10.3389/fevo.2019.00277]
29. Marzluff, J. M. and Rodewald, A. D. (2008). Conserving biodiversity in urbanizing areas: nontraditional views from a bird's perspective. Cities and the Environment, 1 (2): 1-27. [DOI:10.15365/cate.1262008]
30. Mayrand, F. and Clergeau, P. (2018). Green roofs and green walls for biodiversity conservation: a contribution to urban connectivity? Sustainability, 10 (4): 985. [DOI:10.3390/su10040985]
31. Müller, N. (1997). Biotope mapping and nature conservation in cities- part 1: background and methods as basis for a pilot study in the urban agglomeration of Tokyo (Yokohama city). Bulletin of the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Yokohama National University, 119 (1): 97-119.
32. Müller, N. (2008). Distinctive characteristics of urban biodiversity. Urban Biodiversity and Design, International Conference, Erfurt, Germany. https://www.cbd.int/doc/presentations/cities/mayors-01/mayors-01-germany-01-en.pdf
33. Nilon, C. H. (2010). Urban biodiversity and the importance of management and conservation. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 7 (1): 45-52. [DOI:10.1007/s11355-010-0146-8]
34. Noss, R. F. (1990). Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology, 4 (4): 355-364. [DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x]
35. Opoku, A. (2019). Biodiversity and the built environment: Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141: 1-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.011]
36. Ozaki, K., Isono, M., Kawahara, T., Iida, S., Kudo, T. and Fukuyama, K. (2006). A mechanistic approach to evaluation of umbrella species as conservation surrogates. Conservation Biology, 20 (5): 1507-1515. [DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00444.x]
37. Pacheco, R. and Vasconcelos, H. L. (2012). Habitat diversity enhances ant diversity in a naturally heterogeneous Brazilian landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21 (3): 797-809. [DOI:10.1007/s10531-011-0221-y]
38. Pearson, S. M. (2002). Interpreting landscape patterns from organism-based perspectives, In: Gergel, S. E. and Turner, M. G. (Eds.), Learning landscape ecology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. pp. 187-198. [DOI:10.1007/0-387-21613-8_13]
39. QGIS Development Team. (2017). QGIS Geographic Information System [Computer software]. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org
40. Qiu, L., Gao, T., Gunnarsson, A., Hammer, M. and Von Bothmer, R. (2010). A methodological study of biotope mapping in nature conservation. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 9 (2): 161-166. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2010.01.003]
41. Raunkiaer, C. (1934). The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography; being the collected papers of C. Raunkiaer. Oxford, England: Oxford Clarendon. pp. 1-147.
42. Sashikumar, C., Praveen, J. and Nameer, P. O. (Eds.). (2011). Birds of Kerala-Status and Distribution. Kottayam, Kerala, India: DC Books. pp. 1-835.
43. Simberloff, D. (1999). The role of science in the preservation of forest biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 115 (2-3): 101-111. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00391-0]
44. Tzoulas, K. and James, P. (2010). Making biodiversity measures accessible to non-specialists: An innovative method for rapid assessment of urban biodiversity. Urban Ecosystems, 13 (1): 113-127. [DOI:10.1007/s11252-009-0107-x]
45. UNDP. (2016). Biodiversity and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development-technical note. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. pp. 1-25. https://www.undp.org/publications/biodiversity-and-2030-agenda-sustainable-development
46. Vasquez, A. V. and Wood, E. M. (2022). Urban parks are a refuge for birds in park-poor areas. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10: 958572. [DOI:10.3389/fevo.2022.958572]
47. Zúñiga-Vega, J. J., Solano-Zavaleta, I., Sáenz-Escobar, M. F. and Ramírez-Cruz, G. A. (2019). Habitat traits that increase the probability of occupancy of migratory birds in an urban ecological reserve. Acta Oecologica, 101: 103480. [DOI:10.1016/j.actao.2019.103480]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
| Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb