Volume 6, Issue 1 (In Press 2024)
JAD 2024, 6(1): 12-20 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Atabey A, Karakaş R. The bird diversity and conservation recommendations for Mount Zülküf in southeast Anatolia, Türkiye. JAD 2024; 6 (1) :12-20
URL: http://jad.lu.ac.ir/article-1-420-en.html
URL: http://jad.lu.ac.ir/article-1-420-en.html
1- Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, University of Dicle, 21280 Diyarbakır, TÜRKİYE
2- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Dicle, 21280 Diyarbakır, TÜRKİYE ,rkarakas@dicle.edu.tr
2- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Dicle, 21280 Diyarbakır, TÜRKİYE ,
Abstract: (826 Views)
Birds have a special importance in the exceptionally rich biodiversity of Türkiye; nevertheless, the ornithological importance of some parts of the country is inadequately known. The bird diversity of Mount Zülküf (MZ) was studied together with recommendations for conservation proposals. In total, 26 field surveys were conducted on MZ, which is located 6 km from Ergani district of Diyarbakır province, south-eastern Türkiye. During the field observations, transect line and point count methodologies were used, accompanied by the use of standard ornithological equipment, between April 2017 and April 2018. It was aimed at determining the seasonal status, breeding status, and threatened categories of bird species, together with suggesting conservation proposals. Within the scope of the studies conducted in the limited area over one year, 73 bird species, belonging to 25 families and nine orders were determined. Among the bird species identified, 19 are possible, 16 are probable, and 14 are certainly breeding species for the area; which means that 67% of them have breeding potential in the study area. Among the recorded bird species, there is one globally threatened species, while seven are threatened within Türkiye with many more least concern or data deficient species. Recording the bird diversity of the mountain, together with the existing cultural importance of the area in terms of religious tourism, will help to bring to light the ecotourism potential of the area, and could be used for monitoring the area for conservation plans. Raising awareness of the region's bird diversity, among the local people, will offer nature-based tourism opportunities via ornithology in the region.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Species Diversity
Received: 2024/01/8 | Accepted: 2024/03/12 | Published: 2024/03/31
Received: 2024/01/8 | Accepted: 2024/03/12 | Published: 2024/03/31
References
1. Ambarlı, D., Zeydanlı, U. S., Balkız, Ö., Aslan, S., Karaçetin, E., Sözen, M., Ilgaz, Ç., Ergen, A. G., Lise, Y., Çağlayan, S. D., Welch, J. H., Welch, G., Turak, A. S., Bilgin, C. C., Özkil, A. and Vural, M. (2016). An overview of biodiversity and conservation status of steppes of the Anatolian Biogeographical Region. Biodiversity and Conservation, 25: 2491-2519. [DOI:10.1007/s10531-016-1172-0]
2. Berthier, K., Leippert, F., Fumagalli, L. and Arlettaz, R. (2012). Massive nest-box supplementation boosts fecundity, survival and even immigration without altering mating and reproductive behaviour in a rapidly recovered bird Population. PLoS ONE, 7 (4): e36028. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0036028] [PMID] []
3. Bibby, C., Jones, M. and Marsden, S. (1998). Bird Surveys: Expedition Field Techniques. Birdlife International Series. Royal Geographical Society, London, UK. 137 pp.
4. Birdlife International (2000). Threatened Birds of the World. Lynx Edicions and Birdlife. Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK. 852 pp.
5. Birdlife International (2004). Birds in the European :union:: a status assessment: Wageningen. Birdlife International, The Netherlands. 59 pp.
6. Brochet, A. L., Van Den Bossche, W., Jbour, S., Ndang'Ang'A, P. K., Jones, V. R., Abdou, W. A. L. I., Al-Hmoud, A. R., Asswad, N. G., Atienza, J. C., Atrash, I., Barbara, N., Bensusan, K., Bino, T., Celada, C., Cherkaoui, S. I., Costa, J., Deceuninck, B., Etayeb, K. S., Feltrup-Azafzaf, C., Figelj, J., Gustin, M., Kmecl, P., Kocevski, V., Korbeti, M., Kotrošan, D., Mula Laguna, J., Lattuada, M., Leitaõ, D., Lopes, P., López-Jiménez, N., Lucic, V., Micol, T., Moali, A., Perlman, Y., Piludu, N., Portolou, D., Putilin, K., Quaintenne, G., Ramadan-Jaradi, G., Ružic, M., Sandor, A., Sarajli, N., Saveljic, D., Sheldon, R. D., Shialis, T., Tsiopelas, N., Vargas, F., Thompson, C., Brunner, A., Grimmett, R. and Butchart, S. H. M. (2016). Preliminary assessment of the scope and scale of illegal killing and taking of birds in the Mediterranean. Bird Conservation International, 26 (1): 1-28. [DOI:10.1017/S0959270915000416]
7. Catry, I., Franco, A. M. A., Rocha, P., Alcazar, R., Reis, S., Cordeiro, A., Ventim, R., Teodósio, J. and Moreira, F. (2013). Foraging habitat quality constrains effectiveness of artificial nest-site provisioning in reversing population declines in a colonial cavity nester. PLoS ONE, 8 (3): e58320. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0058320] [PMID] []
8. Cordell, H. K. and Herbert, N. G. (2002). The popularity of birding is still growing. Birding, 34: 54-61.
9. Eken, G., Bozdoğan, M., İsfendiyaroğlu, S., Kılıç, D. T. and Lise, Y. (Eds) (2006). Türkiye'nin Önemli Doğa Alanları [Turkey's Key Biodiversity Areas]. Doğa Derneği, Ankara.
10. Ertekin, A. S. and Yıldırım, M. (2014). Ergani'nin Nadir ve Endemik Bitkileri [Rare and Endemic Plants of Ergani], In: Güzel, C. and Haspolat, K. (Eds.), Tüm Yönleriyle Ergani İlçesi ve Turizm [With All Aspects Ergani District and Tourism]. İstanbul. pp. 346-352.
11. Franco, A. M. A., Marques, J. T. and Sutherland, W. J. (2005). Is nest-site availability limiting Lesser kestrel populations? A multiple scale approach. Ibis, 147 (4): 657-666. [DOI:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00437.x]
12. Hagemeijer, E. J. M. and Blair, M. J. (Eds.) (1997). The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds; their distribution and abundance. T. and A.D. Poyser, London, UK. 903 pp.
13. Harisha, M. N. and Hosetti, B. B. (2009). Diversity and distribution of avifauna of Lakkavalli range forest, Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghat, India. Ecoprint, 16: 21-27. [DOI:10.3126/eco.v16i0.3469]
14. Heinzel, H., Fitter, S. R. and Parslow, J. (1998). Birds of Britain and Europe, with North Africa and The Middle East. Harper Collins Publishers, London, UK.
15. Işık, İ. (2013). Diyarbakır Ansiklopedisi [Diyarbakir Encyclopedia], Volume 5. Elvan Yayınevi, Ankara. pp. 251-255.
16. IUCN (2019). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2018-1. http://www.iucnredlist.org (Downloaded on 10 January 2019).
17. Karakaş, R. (2010). Bird diversity in Bismil Plain IBA's with new records for South-eastern Anatolia, Turkey. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56: 471-480. [DOI:10.1007/s10344-009-0336-6]
18. Karakaş, R. (2012). Does Black-Winged Kite Elanus caeruleus (Desfontaines, 1789) Have an expansion in its range in Turkey? Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 64 (2): 209-214.
19. Karakaş, R. (2017). Ornithological importance of artificial ponds: a case study at Kabaklı Pond, south-eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Paddy and Water Environment, 15: 919-930. [DOI:10.1007/s10333-017-0602-2]
20. Karakaş, R. and Biricik, M. (2017). New breeding sites of the Black-winged Kite (Elanus caeruleus) in Turkey (Aves: Falconiformes). Zoology in the Middle East, 63 (3): 277-279. [DOI:10.1080/09397140.2017.1331587]
21. Karakaş, R. and Kılıç, A. (2004). The birds of Dicle Dam (Diyarbakır). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 28 (4): 301-308.
22. Karakaş, R. and Kılıç, A. (2005). The birds of Kralkızı Dam (Diyarbakır), Southeast Turkey. Sandgrouse, 27 (2): 139-146.
23. Khan, M. S. and Pant, A. (2017). Conservation status, species composition, and distribution of avian community in Bhimbandh Wildlife Sanctuary, India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 10: 20-26. [DOI:10.1016/j.japb.2016.07.004]
24. Kılıç, D. T. and Eken, G. (2004). Türkiye'nin Önemli Kuş Alanları - 2004 Güncellemesi [Türkiye's Important Bird Areas - 2004 Update]. Doğa Derneği-BirdLife International, Ankara. 232 pp.
25. Kirwan, G. M., Boyla, K., Castell, P., Demirci, B., Özen, M., Welch, H. and Marlow, T. (2008). The birds of Turkey. Christopher Helm, London, UK. 512 pp.
26. Kirwan, G. M., Martins, R. P., Eken, G. and Davidson, P. (1999). A checklist of the birds of Turkey. Sandgrouse, Supplement 1: 1-32.
27. Kiziroğlu, İ. (2015). Türkiye Kuşları Cep Kitabı [The Pocket Book for Birds of Turkey]. Second Edition. Ankara, Turkey. 577 pp.
28. Koli, V. K. (2014). Diversity and status of avifauna in Todgarh-Raoli Wildlife Sanctuary, Rajasthan, India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 7: 401-407. [DOI:10.1016/j.japb.2014.10.005]
29. Mittermeier, R. A., Turner, W. R., Larsen, F. W., Brooks, T. M. and Gascon, C. (2011). Global biodiversity conservation: The critical role of hotspots, In: Zachos, F. E. and Habel, J. C. (Eds.), Biodiversity hotspots-distribution and protection of conservation priority areas. Springer, Berlin, Germany. pp. 3-22. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_1]
30. Mullarney, K., Svensson, L., Grant, P. J. and Zetterström, D. (1999). Collins Bird Guide. HarperCollins, London, UK. 392 pp.
31. Özgen, N. (2012). Siirt'in İnanç Turizmi Mekânları: Ziyaret (Veysel Karani) ve Tillo (Aydınlar) Örnekleri. Eastern Geographical Journal, 27: 251-272.
32. Redford, K. H. and Richter, B. D. (1999). Conservation of biodiversity in a world of use. Conservation Biology, 13 (6): 1246-1256. [DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97463.x]
33. Sala, O. E., Chapin, F. S., Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D. M., Mooney, H. A., Oesterheld, M., Poff, N. L., Sykes, M. T., Walker, B. H., Walker, M., and Wall, D. H. (2000). Biodiversity - Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287 (5459): 1770-1774. [DOI:10.1126/science.287.5459.1770] [PMID]
34. Şekercioğlu, Ç. H. (2002). Impacts of birdwatching on human and avian communities. Environmental Conservation, 29 (3): 282-289. [DOI:10.1017/S0376892902000206]
35. Tucker, G. M. and Heath, M. F. (1994). Birds in Europe: their conservation status. Birdlife International, Cambridge, UK. 600 pp.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
| Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb